Christian Casper Project
From WolfWikis
Documents
Bibliography
Althaus, S. L. (1997). Computer-mediated communication in the university classroom: An experiment with online discussions. Communication Education, 46, 158–174.
Anson, C. M. (1999). Distant voices: Teaching writing in a culture of technology. College English, 61, 261–280.
Blythe, S. (2001). Designing online courses: User-centered practices. Computers and Composition, 18, 329–346.
Brown, B. W., & Liedholm, C. E. (2004). Student preferences in using online learning resources. Social Science Computer Review, 22, 479–492.
Carey, S. (1999). The use of WebCT for a highly interactive virtual graduate seminar. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 12, 371–380.
Carmichael, D. E. (2001). An educational evaluation of WebCT: A case study using the conversational framework. In P. Kommers & G. Richards (Eds.), Proceedings of World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications 2001 (pp. 233-238). Chesapeake, VA: AACE.
Cheong, P. (2003, May). The Blackboard in the Classroom: Evolving Genres and the Metaphorical function of Instructional Technologies. Paper presented at the meeting of the International Communication Association, San Diego, CA.
Clark, R. A., & Jones, D. (2001). A comparison of traditional and online formats in a public speaking course. Communication Education, 50, 109–124.
Curtin, J. (2002). WebCT and online tutorials: New possibilities for student interaction. Australian Journal of Educational Technology, 18, 110–126.
Hoskins, S. L., & van Hooff, J. C. (2005). Motivation and ability: Which students use online learning and what influence does it have on their achievement? British Journal of Educational Technology, 36, 177–192.
Hutchins, H. M. (2001). Enhancing the business communication course through WebCT. Business Communication Quarterly, 64, 87–94.
Hybrid courses – Hidden dangers? (2004, April 1). Distance Education Report, 8, pp. 3, 6, 7.
Hybrid design enables individualized learning experience. (2005, March 1). Distance Education Report, 9, 6.
Johnson, G. M., & Howell, A. J. (2005). Attitude toward instructional technology following required versus optional WebCT usage. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 13, 643–654.
Joseph, D. (2005, February). Hybrid design enables individualized learning experience. Online cl@ssroom, 1.
Kitto, S. (2003). Translating the electronic panopticon: Educational technology and the re-articulation of lecturer-student relations in online learning. Information, Communication, & Society, 6.1, 1–23.
Laurillard, D. (1993). Rethinking university teaching: A framework for the effective use of educational technology. London: Routledge.
Leh, A. S. C. (2001). Action research on hybrid courses and their online communities. Education Media International, 39, 31–38.
Lorenzetti, J. P. (2004, November 1). For quality and cost-effectiveness, build a hybrid program. Distance Education Report, 8, pp. 1–2, 7.
Martyn, M. (2003). The hybrid online model: Good practice. Educause Quarterly, 26, 18–23.
McCray, G. E. (2000). The hybrid course: Merging online instruction and the traditional classroom. Information Technology and Management, 1, 307–327.
Morss, D. A. (1999). A study of student perspectives on web-based learning. Internet Research: Electronic Networking Applications and Policy, 9, 393–408.
Pan, C.-C., Gunter, G., Sivo, S., & Cornell, R. (2005). End-user acceptance of a learning management system in two hybrid large-sized introductory undergraduate courses: A case study. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 33, 355–365.
Questioning the hybrid model. (2004, May). Online Cl@ssroom, pp. 4, 8.
Rovai, A. P. (2001). Building classroom community at a distance: A case study. Educational Technology Research & Development, 49, 33–48.
Russell, T. L. (2001). The no significant difference phenomenon: A comparative research annotated bibliography on technology for distance education. IDECC.
Sauers, D., & Walker, R. (2004). A comparison of traditional and technology-assisted instructional methods in the business communication classroom. Business Communication Quarterly, 67, 430–442.
Sellnow, D. D., Child, J. T., & Ahlfeldt, S. L. (2005). Textbook technology supplements: What are they good for? Communication Education, 54, 243–253.
Spiliotopoulos, V., & Carey, S. (2005). Investigating the role of identity in writing using electronic bulletin boards. Canadian Modern Language Review, 62, 87–109.
Warner, D. (2003, April). Student recommendations for discussion boards: Conclusions of student problems. In Teaching, Learning and Technology: The Challenge Continues. Proceedings of the Annual Mid-South Instructional Technology Conference, Murfreesboro, TN. Accessed October 11, 2006, from http://www.mtsu.edu/~itconf/proceed03/142.html
White, J. T., and Myers, S. D. (2001). You can teach an old dog new tricks: The faculty’s role in technology implementation. Business Communication Quarterly, 61, 95–101.